Nishesh Basavareddy vs Alibek Kachmazov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Jul at 05:56 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Basavareddy vs A. Kachmazov

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Basavareddy 1 - 0 Kachmazov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nishesh Basavareddy winning 2 and Alibek Kachmazov winning 0. The last match between Nishesh Basavareddy and Alibek Kachmazov was at the Lexington Challenger, 30-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Nishesh Basavareddy getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Basavareddy | 1 |
Kachmazov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Lexington Challenger(07-30-25)
N. Basavareddy vs A. Kachmazov H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$156,470 | Career Prize Money | $169,735 |
62.24% (89-54) | Career Total W/L | 58.86% (206-144) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
2 | Titles | 8 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
35.00% (7-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
N. Basavareddy vs A. Kachmazov Match Preview:
- In analyzing second serve performance over the past six months, Kachmazov has a slight edge, winning 45.01% of points compared to Basavareddy's 42.6%.
- Who seems more formidable returning the opponent’s second serve? Kachmazov is, with a recent stat of 45.6%, surpassing Basavareddy’s 42.09%.
- Regarding first serve returns, how do the players compare? Basavareddy edges out slightly with 26.36%, while Kachmazov is at 25.97%.
- Both players show steadiness under pressure, with Kachmazov saving 56.25% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Basavareddy’s 51.63%.
- In the past year’s performance, Basavareddy shows strong potential, winning 64.56% of matches, compared to Kachmazov's 51.72%.
- What surface does each player favor? Basavareddy excels on Hard courts with a 70% win rate, while Kachmazov performs best on Indoor Hard with 67% wins.
- At the event level, Basavareddy shows a dominant force in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with a win rate of 74.47%, compared to Kachmazov's 52.5%.
- In terms of competing against higher-ranked opponents, Basavareddy has faced players with an average rank of 197.39, higher than Kachmazov's 218.24.
- For deciding sets, Basavareddy is more successful, winning 63% compared to Kachmazov’s 50% in the last year.
- Kachmazov has a better rate of converting breakpoints recently, converting 30.13% of the opportunities, against Basavareddy's 27.08%.
Editorial Prediction (July 30, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent form, Kachmazov exhibits slightly better performance in second serve points and returning abilities. This could be crucial in high-stakes scenarios throughout the match.
Basavareddy, however, shows a stronger overall match win percentage over the past year and faces more challenging opponents, reflecting higher competitive performance experience.
Additionally, Basavareddy's strong performance on deciding sets may prove advantageous in a match extending to the final set, indicating resilience and stamina under pressure.
Given the data, while Kachmazov holds minor advantages in specific areas, Basavareddy's consistent win record, especially against higher-ranked players, positions them as the more likely victor in this upcoming match.
Nishesh Basavareddy vs Alibek Kachmazov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Basavareddy vs A. Kachmazov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 5 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:34:15 | Average Match Time | 1:34:15 |
63% (32/51) | 1st Serve % | 47% (28/59) |
84% (27/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (18/28) |
47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (11/31) |
63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
51% (30/59) | Return Points Win % | 29% (15/51) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Basavareddy Recent Matches Played
A. Kachmazov Recent Matches Played

N. Basavareddy vs A. Kachmazov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62.24% (89/54) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.86% (206/144) |
60.36% (201/132) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.14% (460/345) |
53.63% (1664/1439) | Games Win/Loss | 52.27% (4066/3713) |
67.35% (66/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.52% (91/70) |
30.77% (4/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.21% (27/29) |
62.96% (17/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.18% (88/43) |
40.00% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
575 | Aces Total | 1594 |
0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
474 | Total Double Faults | 1052 |
1:38:29 | Average Match Time | 1:46:33 |
256.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.28 |
58% (5483/9511) | 1st Serve % | 56% (13680/24385) |
71% (3911/5483) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (9569/13680) |
53% (2119/4028) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5452/10704) |
44% (424/963) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1018/2454) |
40% (3836/9591) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9700/24207) |
28.57% (2/5) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
28.57% (2/5) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
63.33% (19/11) | Main Tour W/L | 59.09% (13/9) |
67.82% (59/28) | Challenger W/L | 55.56% (95/76) |
58.33% (7/5) | Futures W/L | 65.10% (97/52) |
64% (87/135) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (200/341) |
14% (1/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
48% (19/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (78/130) |
51% (19/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (57/109) |
81% (96/78) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (209/179) |
18% (96/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (209/28) |
23% (47/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (141/26) |